Process and requirements mapping
Turn current work into a usable map that shows who owns each decision and where exceptions change the process.
ERP migration operations
ERP migration plans usually describe the software. They rarely show how daily work keeps moving while the data changes and the vendor waits on decisions from people who still have a business to run.
I step in as a Fractional Operations Manager and hold the work between the implementation plan and the operating day.

The fit
The best fit is a team that has selected its ERP or already begun implementation, while the internal work keeps waiting for someone to own the next decision.
Your business owners keep approval authority while I own the coordination and follow-through across the migration.
Process decisions keep waiting for a clear owner.
Source data still needs cleanup rules the business understands.
Vendor tasks and internal work live in different plans.
Cutover has a date but no rehearsal or fallback owner.
Migration operations
The role is hands-on. I keep decisions moving and surface risk early, with enough documentation that the next handoff does not depend on memory.
Turn current work into a usable map that shows who owns each decision and where exceptions change the process.
Set cleanup and reconciliation rules before data moves, then prove the result against the source instead of trusting a green import screen.
Keep the implementation partner and internal team working from the same current plan, with dependencies visible before they become delays.
Walk through the actual operating day before launch so missed access or timing issues surface while there is still time to find the owner and fix them.
Document the work in plain language and prepare the people who will own it after the project team leaves.
After go-live, keep every issue tied to an owner until the new routine settles and interruptions stop multiplying.
The migration operating path
A signed-off configuration is only one checkpoint. The work still has to survive real data and the first day when the project team is no longer in every conversation.
Phase 1
I make the current process visible and identify who can decide when the software forces a tradeoff.
Phase 2
I help define cleanup and validation rules, with a clear fallback when reconciliation does not pass.
Phase 3
I walk the team through the real operating day so the vendor happy path does not hide a dependency.
Phase 4
I keep every issue tied to an owner until the team can run the new system without depending on the project team for daily decisions.
Experience behind the work
I spent 14 years building and operating an ERP SaaS platform from scratch. It grew to about 80 clients while I owned the work from architecture through support.
I later designed a modern ERP architecture from the lessons of that platform. My broader data migration work includes chain-of-custody documentation for sensitive records.
I built and operated an ERP SaaS platform from scratch, serving about 80 clients without outside funding.
I later designed a modern ERP architecture using the lessons from those 14 years.
I managed adoption and foster care records across different state requirements for more than a decade.
I created operational SOPs and project practices for a distributed team; the processes continued after I left.
Engagement shape
I can reset a project that has started to drift or join before implementation work accelerates. The scope stays close to delivery and the operating handoff.
I map the work already in motion and expose the decisions that are waiting, so the team has one operating plan.
I coordinate the cross-team work, keep the readiness checklist current, and surface decisions before they become delays.
I stay through the first operating cycle and close the loose ends before the team carries the routine on its own.
Next step
The first conversation starts with the work already in motion. I look first at the handoff most likely to break and the person who can own the next decision.